Some Blog Site

There are some things that are tradition at Christmas but are not correct. Here is what I have noticed, either on my own or once someone pointed it out to me. Hopefully this doesn’t come across as bah-humbug-ish.

• The wise men came from one country. They are not from different countries. Around here they are usually portrayed as 3 guys of different ethnicities, which implies they were from different places but came together on their mission to follow the star. But they were from the same place so they should have been of similar features. Historically they were thought to be Persian, so that’s what I think of them as.
• I’m not going to correct the idea that there were three wise men, because everyone already knows that we don’t know the number. But if you’re going to have wise men in a scene you have to pick some specific number, so you could argue with any number that’s chosen. Except one. If someone says there was 1 wise man then you can argue that. So let’s just stick with 3 and not argue about it. Feel free to argue about if the wise men were at the Nativity though.
• The angels did not sing. They spoke to the shepherds. As far as I can tell, angels are not the singing type. I even checked Revelation, and there it describes the angels as speaking not singing.
• We do know that Jesus was born at night. This point is not to correct something that’s traditionally wrong but rather pointing out that the tradition is factually correct. It’s not just because of the star, although the star is why all the Nativity scenes are portrayed at night. That, and enough other things portray the Nativity at night (such as the carol Silent Night).

Now you too can be a hit at parties and step in with a “technically” or “well actually” to keep things right.

Now that no one is talking about the Fremby font anymore, it’s time to announce that Font Grill has released a new font.

Introducing: Fontopian Font

Go download Fontopian.

I was inspired by the logo of The Autopian website. I didn’t think much of the logo before this, but they ran an article about how the Autopian logo came to be and that got me nostalgic about the process of making a font so I decided to give it a go.

It seems that everyone knows the lesson from the Spider-Man origin story – with great power comes great responsibility.

There is a similar quote from Eleanor Roosevelt though that I’d like to focus on today.

For freedom makes a huge requirement of every human being. With freedom comes responsibility.

It makes sense – if you’re not free to decide something, then you’re not responsible for it. It happens at work: the corporate policy tells you to do something, then it’s not your fault if it turns out bad. But if you are free to decide something then you have the responsibility for its outcome.

In this election year, I notice many of the ads are pushing for something called “reproductive freedom” but I also notice that no one is pushing for “reproductive responsibility”. I say they are two sides of the same coin. People want freedom with no responsibility. And in many ways this modern world appears to allow more freedom with less responsibility.

Consider what the end result is, not just of reproductive freedom with no responsibility, but of general freedom without responsibility. Is human nature such that people will do what’s good for them and others? That’s the benefit of natural consequences – it keeps peoples’ behavior in check.

I think the internet provides a glimpse of what happens. Consider the internet to be a virtual society with no physical consequences: people do and say things that they wouldn’t do in person. If we keep removing natural consequences from personal behaviors, it won’t be progress. And “reproductive freedom” is just the current example of that.

Thanks to someone’s generosity in loaning us her car while ours was in the shop, I got to hear a few days’ worth of satellite radio. So we tried to get a wide variety of stations while we could, and I tried to explain the significance of various songs in regard to the culture at the time. One of the songs that came on was “The Beat Goes On” by Sonny and Cher.

It was written to highlight how things are changing, and things are staying the same. And it oddly still works today. It reminds me of a monologue by Roy Rogers, I think. The way it was written it spoke of politics and societal events in a general enough way that it was timeless. I wish I could find it on the internet, but no such luck today.

Anyway, here are some of the lyrics to The Beat Goes On

Charleston was once the rage, uh-huh
History has turned the page, uh-huh
The miniskirt’s the current thing, uh-huh
Teenybopper is our newborn king, uh-huh

I suppose miniskirts are still around, not sure about teenyboppers anymore though. This verse is a wash: +1 and -1.

The grocery store’s the super mart, uh-huh
Little girls still break their hearts, uh-huh
And men still keep on marching off to war
Electrically they keep a baseball score

This one’s still true on all counts. Although it’s not noteworthy now that baseball scores are kept electronically, it was a big deal back then. But it’s still true today.

Grandmas sit in chairs and reminisce
Boys keep chasing girls to get a kiss
The cars keep going faster all the time
Bums still cries, “Hey buddy, have you got a dime?”

This one’s mostly true. Cars do keep going faster all the time. As far as I can tell, we’ve reached diminishing returns on that one, both in top speed and in 0-60 acceleration – however you want to consider “faster”. The things that not quite true is that bums don’t ask for dimes. They still ask for money, but in denominations larger than dimes.

And the beat goes on

Okay, this one’s the chorus not a verse. But it needs to be acknowledged that the beat is still going on today, so +1 for that too.

It’s mid-to-late June, and it looks like there’s snow on the ground here in southern Michigan. In northern Michigan it might be actual snow, but here it is just the cottonwood trees shedding.

I didn’t get a good picture of the fluffy white “cotton” falling gently through the air, but this is what it looks like after it lands.

Unfortunately, it does not pack well into snowballs, nor can you make fabric out of it. It’s just for visual interest, and for finding out who has seasonal allergies.

It’s not band books week, but there was a news story – or whatever substitutes for one in these social media days – about some people getting upset at certain schools for banning some books.

And I got to thinking that they’re overreacting.

Sure, the schools aren’t allowing some books in the school, but how is that different from any other category?

Our schools in the area have a dress code. Certain types of outfits are not allowed at school. Are groups protesting the fact that the school has banned those?

Our schools in the area also have a movie policy. Teachers are not allowed to show anything over PG-13 (or PG for the lower grades). It’s the same for the charter buses used for long field trips. So certain types of movies are not allowed at school. Are groups protesting the fact that the school has banned those?

The people who are mad at the schools for “banning books” are approaching it from the wrong angle. The angle should be that the content of any media is restricted to what’s appropriate for the age.

Part of the problem is that there is not a rating system for books like there is for movies. If there were, then it would be easy for the school to have a policy of “School library books are to be rated PG-13 or lower” or something like that.

The other part of the problem is that books are synonymous with knowledge, so the people opposed to restricting books are decrying that as banning knowledge. On one hand, I suppose you could learn a lesson from just about any books, but on the other hand some books are meant just for entertainment. Not all books are equal when it comes to their educational merits, and thus their place in school.

I’m not posting anything today – I’m too busy doing Thanksgivingy stuff.